Mother of Mac

[cartman414]

Originally Posted by girl_named_goo

In Foster's universe, Imaginary Friends are regarded with the same wide range of sympathy as cats and dogs in our universe. In our universe, one person with a dog who had to move would spend lots of time and money searching for an apartment that allows dogs, and perhaps even live in a place below their standards to keep their pet. Other people would give their dog to a friend or find them new home. Other people would just drop them off at a local shelter, and other people still would abandon the dog in a park or even have them put down. I personally would make the sacrifices to keep my dog, but who am I to judge those who would find them a new home?? How about people who give up their pet because they have behavior problems or are too large and hyper for their children?

Where does the line of sympathy stop? Some people will do anything for a dog or cat, but many don't care about "lesser" pets like hamsters, ferrets, rats, snakes, goldfish etc. Where would Imaginary Friends fit?

Mac's Mom just has a lower regard for IF's than Mac or the Foster's. She's not a bad person, and in fact, she opted to find a new home for Bloo not because she is cold, but because she felt keeping Bloo was hindering her son's development. Even if she was wrong, can we question her intentions?

That sums it up pretty well from what I observed from pilot summaries. (It's not that I'm a casual viewer, but a hunger for deeper insight that leads me to reading episode guides.) On the whole, Mac's mom seems like she wants the best for him, even if she might not see things from her perspective. And given that she's a single (she is, right?) working mom, and he's a fun-loving, if conscientious young kid, there's a bit of a divide there. Not that it's anything harmful though.