I don't get why people get into a tizzy over sexual references. It's really, really simple -- if they get it, they already know what it means, and that's not the creators' problem. If they don't, it won't hurt them. It's not rocket science. Besides, most cartoons have them.

Yeah -- the characters in Foster's are rambunctious and get angry, while the characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy scam people, call each other "loser", beat each other up, run around with no parents in sight, and um... have green and blue tongues. And EEnE is better. I don't know about you guys, but that makes sense to me, because scamming and name-calling goes on in real life, but people never get angry. Also, it's better to not let your kid watch a cartoon just in case they think imaginary friends are real rather than, you know, explain that they aren't. Hooray for letting the TV babysit your children!

They've got to be kidding. I doubt they've watched either show. These uptight (censored) need to find something useful to do with their lives. I'm sorry, but I have no regard for people of this sort, none at all. Send them back to the Stone Age where they belong.

The funny part was the reviewer suggesting young children to watch Ed, Edd 'n Eddy. :P EEnE is less appropriate for younger children than Foster's is. I don't take these seriously. I just think these folks are dopes. :P

Heh heh heh, These uptight media watchdog groups, are always great for a couple of laughs.

I personally always love it when they break out the 50 cent words in some kind of vain attempt to make them selves look all academic and self important. 8D

what i found funny was that its a "common sense review"

ok im a fan of all three shows involved here, and i can say that Fosters is probably the most family friendly one of them all. E,E,nE, well i think you all have said more than enough of what you think on that. but TWT? seriously, these people i dont think even own a tv.



...the whole thing was probably written by somebody who obviously is missing some of his/her brain cells. like all of them.

...Someone who made this is probably a Foster hater. Hey, Foster haters can exist. Nothing we can do about it.:P

No, just a person who didn't bother watching enough episodes and/or didn't do enough research on the show. :(

The show ain't creative to the reviewer, eh? This person obviously must have a fear of creativity if they watch the most wacky episodes and still don't find it creative.

Ed, Edd n' Eddy as an suggestion? I don't think so. That show's has even more mean stuff than this show.

this is just humaliating. ive actually favorited this page, mostly because i could always use a good laugh.

on a side note, i find it funny by how much they say KND is not fit for kids.

Oh nyo XD I'm having a total field day with this website. I remember stumbling on it before, and it's just as funny today as it was a few years ago.

I don't want to drift offtopic, but their #1 choice instead of invader zim was jimmy neutron. Hilarious! I know what website's going to be keeping me up all night.

That website also fails to back up most of the things they say... I looked up another one of my favorite tv shows and they claim, "the characters are underdeveloped, and overall the show feels forced." ...along with a bunch of other things. I love a good argument against shows I like, but is it really so hard to tell people why you think something sucks?

It's like tv.com- but eight times more lullz because these reviews were made by serious adults who lacked screen names with an "x0x0" or a danny phantom-foster's crossover fanfic that they're more than willing to advertise at any given second.

That review makes me laugh.